“Kenya’s election rerun could be a major setback for African democracy” a new Washington Post editorial was published Monday evening in the United States. I suspect The Post here has fairly well reflected the general view of the Kenyan situation in Washington.
What to do? I think the International Crisis Group has a long track record of assessing conflict in Kenya and offering helpful suggestions. They did good work that I relied on in the 2008 crisis. The Daily Nation picked up their latest recommendation here:
At the same time, a conflict prevention organisation, International Crisis Group, asked the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission to go back to the Supreme Court and seek a limited extension of timeline by 30-45 days to allow all parties to take part in the election and avert a crisis.
The group said Kenya’s political leaders should support such an extension and commit to participate.
According to ICG, the precedent for such a delay exists.
“The High Court in 2012 delayed elections by six months, which helped ensure a credible and peaceful vote,” the group said in a statement.
“The Supreme Court should favourably consider such an extension, given the IEBC chairman’s own acknowledgement that the commission cannot guarantee a credible vote within the allotted timeline.”
The ICG said that should it grant a delay, the court ought to state clearly that President Kenyatta would remain in office pending the fresh vote and that Nasa leader Raila Odinga should take part in a delayed poll without additional conditions.
“He should renew the welcome public pledge against violence that he made on October 20.
“He also should rein in and hold accountable supporters who have attacked election officials, made inflammatory threats to disrupt election or otherwise broken the Kenyan law,” the group said.
And see “World papers and magazines to postpone repeat poll” in the Daily Nation.