From the Kenya Election and Political Process Strengthening (KEPPS) Program from USAID for the last Kenyan election:
“Considering the role that results transmission played in the 2007 election violence, IFES will build on its recent work with Kenya’s results transmission system to further enhance it and ensure its sustainability. IFES will ensure this system is fully installed, tested and operational for the 2012 election. Furthermore, IFES will fund essential upgrades and adjustments to this results transmission system.”
[p.28 of the Kenya Election and Political Process Strengthening 2012 Program – Cooperative Agreement between USAID and CEPPS (coalition of NDI, IFES and IRI)]
The Agreement is heavily redacted and divided into four files for length;
(1 of 4) F-00034-16 1st Interim-Response Documents (4-4-2017)
(2 of 4) F-00034-16 1st Interim-Response Documents (4-4-2017)
(3 of 4) F-00034-16 1st Interim-Response Documents (4-4-2017)
(4 of 4) F-00034-16 1st Interim-Response Documents (4-4-2017)
Since I have been fussing periodically about how long it has been taking to get any documents released from my October 2015 FOIA request to USAID for documents about our funding for the IEBC in 2013 and related, I need to thank the USAID FOIA Office for getting this initial release out (and hope for the rest to be in time to be usable for process improvement for the impending next election).
As I wrote more than two years ago, as more information was being uncovered in the UK’s prosecution of Smith & Ouzman, Ltd. and its owners for bribing Kenyan election officials for favor on procurements: USAID’s Inspector General should take a hard look at Kenya’s election procurements supported by U.S. taxpayers.
Also see: “Thoughts on Kenya’s Supreme Court Opinion” from April 2013:
The Court did not give rulings on the admission of evidence such as the videotapes presented by AfriCOG’s counsel of results being announced at the County level that differed substantially from those announced by the IEBC at its national tally centre in Nairobi, or otherwise grapple with any specifics of reported anomalies, including those among the sample of 22 polling stations that were to be re-tallied. Nor did it address the fact that its order to review all 33,000 Forms 34 and the Forms 36 from all constituencies was only slightly over half completed.
The Court declined to impose legal consequences in terms of the announced election outcome from the failure of the IEBC’s technology, but significantly did find that the main cause of the failures of the electronic voter identification system and the electronic results transmission system appeared to be procurement “squabbles” among IEBC members. “It is, indeed, likely, that the acquisition process was marked by competing interests involving impropriety, or even criminality: and we recommend that this matter be entrusted to the relevant State agency, for further investigation and possible prosecution.”
According to the Independent Review (“Kreigler”) Commission, in 2007 USAID through IFES paid for the purchase of computers for the planned results transmission system for the ECK. Very late before the vote, according to the Commission, the ECK voted to shelve the system and not use it. None of the actors, ECK, IFES, USAID nor the US Ambassador publicly disclosed the “shelving” decision. The Ambassador gave his subsequent pre-election Nairobi interview published as “Ambassador expects free and fair election” nonetheless.
The Kreigler Commission investigating sought the minutes of the ECK’s action; the ECK refused to release the minutes and the Commission went ahead and submitted its report to President Kibaki and disbanded, noting the missing evidence. [Again, I was told by a diplomat involved in January 2008 that key Returning Officers at the last minute were bribed to turn off their cell phones and “go missing” so that vote tallies could then be “marked upwards” to give Kibaki the necessary margin at the national level; likewise, we learned from the Daily Nation that Wikileaks published cables showing that the U.S. issued “visa bans” against three ECK members based on evidence of alleged bribery. The late decision by the ECK to shelve the U.S. purchased computer system would thus have been critical to allowing the bribery scheme to be effectuated. See “The War for History part seven: What specifically happened to Kenyan’s votes?“.]
In 2007 we obviously knew that the system had been shelved and kept quiet about it. In 2013 we let on that we expected the system to work–even was in the process of working–until it was shut down early after the vote. That is hard to understand given that IFES was to “ensure this system was fully installed, tested and operational” and make the necessary purchases. I will hope that the rest of the requested documents will clarify all this and be released as soon as possible to benefit the planning for the upcoming 2017 election.
See also: “Nigeria example shows U.S. and other donors should act now on Kenya IEBC technology procurement corruption“.
IFES…NDI…ATMs dispensing US Government money at home and abroad? Whether elections were held as scheduled in 2012 or eventually on 4 March 2013 and regardless of whether a new vote reporting system works it’s all the same to the US Government and, apparently, to all the rest of the international community spending money and ticking boxes to facilitate democracy in the sovereign state of Kenya; local civil society organizations and media houses receiving this largesse have overwhelmingly accepted the American standard of performance just to keep the money coming?
Meanwhile the likelihood of credible elections being held on 8 August 2017 is NIL but nobody has the integrity or moral courage to mention that the emperor is naked; beautiful clothes, Sir!
Pingback: We all know that Kenya suffers from pervasive corruption; we have all been warned about lack of transparency in the election | AFRICOMMONS Blog
Pingback: While Washington grapples with another Kenyan election mess, an update on my FOIA pursuit of our policy from 2007 | AFRICOMMONS Blog
Pingback: Election Assistance FOIA update: disappointed to see from USAID records that IFES was supporting Kenya IEBC/Kenyatta-Ruto defense of 2013 election petition by civil society and opposition - AFRICOMMONS
Pingback: The battle over OT-Morpho/IDEMIA and corruption in Kenyan elections has commenced with vote in Parliament to ban the French vendor - AFRICOMMONS
Pingback: Kenya Election Preparation: Standing aside on 2013 investigation to raise alarm for 2022 - AFRICOMMONSAFRICOMMONS