This actually seems a bit dramatic: the High Court in Mombasa has ruled that Chirau Ali Makware’s parliamentary seat is to be vacated due to election regularities and a by-election held. The Standardheadline is here; and Capital FM here.
Perhaps this will ultimately be good for ordinary Kenyans who depend on matatus and buses. Striking for a senior inside PNU player in politics and business to lose his seat. While I don’t know much about the details of this case, and will hope to learn more, this is likely an example of that inconvenient detail of the Kreigler Report that people don’t like to talk about so much: the whole election process had big problems and the specific situation on the presidential vote tally doesn’t mean that other election results necessarily stand up to close scrutiny.
I agree with the Speaker that enforcement of existing laws is really the key to changing the environment of impunity for politicians. New laws will not help if the law is ignored anyway. Certainly there have been plenty of rumors and more specific stories in circulation about bribery in Parliament. Almost two years in to this Parliament it certainly seems past time to face this head on.
A way to proceed is to have specific statements from those with knowledge and certainly MPs such as Ms. Karua should follow up. But likewise the media should follow up. Corruption issues are continually raised or hinted at in the Kenya media, or even covered in depth initially, but then nothing more. For the Kenyan media to effectively fulfill any type of watchdog role, they will have to learn to start and finish these stories, and to do a lot more actual reporting rather than simply relaying to readers what the various politicians and officials have to say.
Likewise, there is no reason for law enforcement to wait for insiders to hand them the evidence. We see in some areas that the various Kenyan law enforcement agencies can conduct investigations–why do they have to wait for insider whistleblowers?
I must say that I don’t agree with prosecuting a Member for what we in the US would call “speech and debate” in the legislature, but nonetheless, those with knowledge of bribery in Parliament do have an obligation to come forward–and should be protected in doing so.