Why would we trust the Kenyan IEBC vote tally when they engaged in fraudulent procurement practices for key technology?

It has been clear for many months that the IEBC’s procurement of BVR kits was irregular.  It is now quite clear that even after Kenyan civil society called the IEBC on the carpet on that problem, the IEBC engaged in clear misconduct in buying the “poll book” system.  When they were caught, the procurement was allowed to go through because of the limited amount of time before the election.  The “poll book” book system largely failed and on election day polling stations used a wholly manual system–a printout on paper.

See the details on the fraudulent bidding here from the today’s Standard: “Minutes reveal how IEBC bought faulty gadgets”:

A review of the tendering procedure by the public procurement regulator found out the tender to supply poll books was awarded to the South African firm, which participated in the Anglo Leasing scandal, on September 29 last year, three weeks before the technical evaluation among the shortlisted bidders.

In other words, the bidding was a sham, because the “winner”, which never could produce a working system, was selected in advance, before the evaluation of which  systems worked–and thus the working systems never had a real rather than a pretend opportunity to be selected over the non-working system.

Getting down into details, the failure of this key procurement left a situation in which much of the presumed value of the Biometric Voter Registration was lost because there was no ability to use any automated voter list at the polls.  The use of the paper print out opens a big window for fraud because one would have to obtain and verify each of the individual print outs from more than 33,000 polling stations to know whether what was used on paper matched up with the central voter registration list in Nairobi (leaving aside the fact that the IEBC never finalized and published a uniform voter registration list as required, which makes the issue doubly important).

I have no way to know whether the IEBC was simply corrupt in its procurement practices resulting unintentionally in the failure of the poll book system, or whether there was some deliberate intent within the IEBC to avoid the application of the electronic system.

Assuming for the sake of argument that no one at the IEBC deliberately wanted to undermine the intended voting systems, it remains quite clear that the IEBC engaged in conduct that clearly violated the public trust in preparing for the election.  So how can we simply trust the same body on the vote tally itself?

8 thoughts on “Why would we trust the Kenyan IEBC vote tally when they engaged in fraudulent procurement practices for key technology?

  1. My “Money For Nothing-Note No. 4” dated 18 December 2012 entitled “The IEBC, International Donors and the Next General Elections” ended: I believe that the American Chamber of Commerce Kenya must call immediately for the General Elections to be postponed to 19th October 2013.
    Emailed to the senior executives and board members of the Chamber as well as to the CommercialAttache US Embassy and an assortment of newspaper editors or columnists, this common sense proposal was based on publicly available information that clearly showed that the IEBC and GOK could not hold any legitimate or credible elections on March 4, 2013.
    There was no response from any of the addressees to my suggestion; some of the recipients informally mentioned that they found it quite well written and amusing but cautioned that I should “watch out” and avoid pissing off Chamber officials?
    Officials of the AMERICAN CHAMBER OF COMMERCE KENYA!?!

  2. Pingback: Kenya needs a better election review process next time . . . as respondents argue that IEBC has done “so much” that presidential election announcement should stand as good enough | AfriCommons Blog

  3. Pingback: At Easter, chicks come home to roost for U.S. on underwriting impunity in Kenya; but “we” do not need Uhuruto | AfriCommons Blog

  4. Pingback: Thoughts on Kenya’s Supreme Court opinion | AfriCommons Blog

  5. Pingback: Carter Center quietly publishes strikingly critical Final Report from Kenya 2013 Election Observation | AfriCommons Blog

  6. Pingback: USAID Inspector General should take a hard look at Kenya’s election procurements supported by U.S. taxpayers | AfriCommons Blog

  7. Pingback: Nigeria example shows U.S. and other donors should act now on Kenya IEBC technology procurement corruption | AfriCommons Blog

  8. Pingback: New testimony on IEBC “Chickengate” procurement corruption in Parliament ahead of visit by Obama and U.S. Congressmen | AfriCommons Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s